Showing posts with label property. Show all posts
Showing posts with label property. Show all posts

How to tell if an apartment is worth buying

I like to read opinion by Earnest Cheong. Hardly to find these type of reviews now days. The other is Chang Kim Loong of National House Buyers Association (www.hba.org.my) articles. Learn tricks from them rather than gobbling up all you can eat from the property sales agent. 


KUALA LUMPUR May2017: A property expert has warned prospective buyers of apartments and condominium units in the Klang Valley that many such properties have been poorly maintained.

This would be especially true of units currently owned by people who bought them between 2012 and 2014, speculating that they could make money by reselling them after a short period, said Ernest Cheong, a chartered surveyor with more than 40 years of experience.

Cheong told FMT many apartment complexes were already suffering from a lack of proper maintenance because the unit owners or residents were refusing to pay maintenance fees.

“I think this problem will become worse because many people bought properties on a speculative basis between 2012 to 2014,” he said.

“Now it is a renter’s market and I foresee that many speculative buyers will have trouble selling the units they thought they could flip for a quick buck or renting them out due to the oversupply of such properties.”


Cheong said those who couldn’t sell or rent their places out might find it difficult to pay maintenance fees on top of servicing their bank loans.

“People who bought the units on a speculative basis without the intention of living there may not feel the urgency to honour their commitment to paying their maintenance fees,” he said.

“As a rule of thumb, if even 30% of owners in an apartment or condominium complex don’t pay their management fees, the building’s joint management body (JMB) or joint management committee (JMC) may not have enough money to properly maintain the property,” he said.

This is a problem that the JMC for four blocks of the Flora Damansara apartment complex is familiar with. A member of the committee, Amir Johari Abdullah, said the management had been fighting a losing battle to maintain the high-rise blocks.

“Many people who bought the units don’t stay here; they rent out their units,” he told FMT.

His JMC manages more than 2,500 units, and only 48% of the owners regularly pay their maintenance fees. As a result, facilities and services have been affected. Amir said the management couldn’t even repair the now disused swimming pool.

“Before we took over, the collection rate was under 40%. So we resorted to drastic measures to increase the collections.”

The measures included denial of car stickers and water supply.

“When we clamp the water meters, those who haven’t paid up for three to four months will promptly pay. But there are also those with vacant units who refuse to pay because it doesn’t affect them.”

In those cases, the management would resort to legal action, but Amir said this was a slow and lengthy process.

According to him, even if the management could achieve a 100% collection rate today, it still would not be enough to pay for maintenance expenses because there were outstanding debts.

He said the amount owed to the JMC was more than RM2 million.

“We actually need to raise the maintenance fees to break even, but it’s hard to ask people to pay more now because some may feel that the facilities need to be improved first. It’s a chicken and egg situation.”

Cheong said prospective buyers of apartments and condominium units should look out for “maintenance red flags” before making their decision.

“It’s best for those interested in buying an apartment or condo to visit the place a number of times, over a month or two, to get a feel of the place.”

“Usually, the lift will be among the most neglected facility if there aren’t enough people to pay the maintenance fees. The lift’s journey should be smooth and not jerky or noisy. The doors must also close properly.”

He said corridors must be clear of any personal belongings such as shoe racks or bicycles. Cluttered corridors would be evidence of poor enforcement by the management, he added.

“Also look for water marks on the facade of the building as well as on the ceilings of the units. Be sure to ask the management how often the swimming pools are cleaned and, if possible, go and see for yourself if the pools are cleaned as scheduled.”

For apartments with landscaping and water features, such as fountains and ponds, Cheong said buyers should look out for weeds, moss and stagnant water.

Other red flags, he said, were loan shark stickers, the poor condition of playgrounds, notices of foreclosure on the doors, warnings on maintenance-fee arrears and discussion of issues on the building’s notice board.

“You don’t have to rush to buy a home now as it is a renter’s market,” he said. “There are more sellers than there are buyers. But if you are inclined to buy a home and can afford one, please do your homework and take your time doing so.”


Property jargon & buying cost

It is simple to buy but to the layman buying the first property, its a jungle!






Pro and con of joint property ownership

Yes they are pro and cons of joint property ownership.

For me, it favour the lenders, because they can hold all parties responsible, thus lowering their risk.

A default means all parties got tainted records. Live long alongs n lelongs.....

Kredit: theedgeproperty.com

A good place to learn about property. Don't know how long it will last.

How to bid E-lelong

How to bid property E-lelong? A system test to avoid collusion within the industry players.

I just hope they make good progress.

Kredit: theedge.com


Hak dibawah Akta Strata

Siapakah yang pertama akan didakwa dibawah Akta Strata. Kita tunggu dan lihat kemunculan kambing hitam tersebut walaupun yang putih amat sedikit.

ekkamai-simplelife
klik imej untuk besarkan

akta-strata

akta-strata

Rumah oh rumah - Aku tak mampu memilikimu

Ketidakmampuan memiliki rumah telah diketahui umum. Namun mereka yang diberikuasa adalah penyamun sebenarnya. Selagi apa yang mereka dapat tersedia depan mata, membutakan mata, memekakan telinga adalah sifat semulajadi mereka, apa mereka mahu revolusi? Walaupun mengetahui kekuatan kerajaan Singapura adalah pada keupayaan menyelesaikan pekara keperluan asas rakyatnya.

Khazanah Research Institute (badan kerajaan ni) melalui repot pada 24 Ogos 2015 mula membuka bicara. Diulang pula oleh Lapuran Bank Negara 2015, namun siapa peduli?

Terusan dicanang harga rumah sekitar RM500K adalah rumah milik. Bangangnya mereka!

 Memang saya marah dengan puak-puak yang menjanjikan langit & bumi setiap 4 tahun nie.






Yang tidak mampu ketika ini, bersedialah dengan 10% deposit untuk rumah idaman anda (buat homework sekarang) kerana rasanya tak lama dah firesale akan kembali.

Tak logik untuk BNM melaung sekuat itu kerana mereka-mereka itu adalah yang terarif dalam hal kewangan!

Untuk yang bersedia, jadikan Rumah oh rumah - Aku mampu memilikimu.


Housing Developers and Deposits

This article sourced from the sun, as a reminder to all small people out there that you had a right that you might not be aware off.


Article by: Gurdial Singh Nijar

TODAY I narrate a personal story. It relates to housing developers – and their selling "antics". It needs to be told so that you will be on guard when you face a similar situation. I am not indicting all developers of course.

First, the developer announces the launch of a project over a weekend. The roads to the launch site are well signposted with fancy boards and bunting. A lavish spread awaits you at the site – complete with a professionally-designed show house.

An elaborate model of the entire location is placed at the centre. Replete with eco-forested areas, exquisite landscaping, a fancy club house, ponds and pools galore.

It's a contrived carnival atmosphere – to lure you into making possibly the biggest financial commitment in your life.

Officers from a coterie of banks sit alongside the developer's representatives. To show you how incredibly easy it is to make a purchase and how little it will eat into your budget. There are profuse promises – getting the loan approved? After a quick calculation of your income – an assurance: no problem, lah!

The developer's rep then assures you – if any problem in getting the loan the money "can sure refund".

And then the infamous – "only few lots left" – better confirm now – pointing to the red "sold" dots on the plan. A sense of daring overcomes you. You abandon your "hum and hah" as you are gently nudged into signing a document headed "Option to Purchase".

Fast forward to some time ahead – you can't get the loan; or you realise that the property is not affordable. What then? No problem – you ask for your money back. It is then that you crash into a barrier.

Whatever you do – even beg or plead – these (few) developers will not return the money. They will give every possible reason to avoid a refund. They will ask you to put your money as a deposit for another house in their other project. Or that they have suffered a loss – even though the same house has been now sold to someone else.

You can sue for your money – but if lack of money prevented you from making the purchase – how can you possibly afford a lawyer? And how will you match the deep pockets of these fat cats and their legal officers?

After a while you let the matter rest in utter despair. You are left to little else than telling your sad story to your friends and others.

In my case I even knew the top echelon "owner" of this development company – a former college mate. We don't cheat people of their money, he declared glibly when first told of my plight in not getting the refund from his company. But after almost three years of phone calls and several stories of how it was his employees and not he who was refusing the refund – the reality dawned of how much more difficult it must be for others less well-connected to get a refund.

What is the legal position then? First, there is a difference between paying this money for a "residential" property and a "commercial" property, even an inexpensive shop lot.

It is illegal for a developer to collect any money before signing a sale and purchase agreement (SPA) in respect of a residential property. It can be labelled by any name – deposit, earnest money, option to purchase, advance, stakeholder sum or whatever other name the developer's fertile imagination creates. The developer cannot take this money until the purchaser has signed the SPA. If he does so, he commits an offence under the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Regulation 1989. The developer commits a criminal offence punishable with a fine up to RM20,000 or jail up to five years or both.

Further all monies collected must be refunded – in full and without any deduction. As long ago as 1981 the Privy Council (then our highest court) brought to book a developer in Johor Baru. The law, said the court, was there to protect house buyers; and developers would be punished for flouting it (Daiman Development Sdn Bhd v Mathew Lui Chin Teck).

Then the lawyers got into the act. They started collecting the monies on the developers' behalf as "stakeholders". And they called it an "option fee". A genuine stakeholder holds money (or anything else) pending the fulfilment of an event – such as approval from some authority. The court struck down this forensic devious device in a 2013 decision: Wan Ming Sun v Planet Uno Sdn Bhd. It was illegal, the court declared.

But then there are lawyers who continue to flout this provision. And despite a clear Bar Council warning against this practice. Should not the Bar Council turbo-boost its enforcement machinery; and at least alert the authorities to prosecute the lawyer(s) under the housing regulations? Surely the knowledge is in the legal fraternity's public domain.

What of those who buy a commercial shop lot and end up in the same predicament? There is no similar protection in this case. The only recourse is to argue that the contract has not come into existence because the precondition of signing the SPA has not materialised. This is a lot harder as the developer will argue that the basic terms – set out in the sheet that he got the purchaser to sign – are clear (property, price and such like). And without doubt, the unethical developers will likely get their favourite obeisant legal eagle to include a clause that says that the money will not be refunded if the SPA is not signed.

Should not the government consider enacting a law similar to that for residential properties to protect the buyers of commercial property – especially now that the volume of the sale of small shop lots has grown so large?

Gurdial is professor at the Law Faculty, University of Malaya.



Borrowers, no one cares about you!


pity-the-borrowers

If you think they cares, think again. do read THIS and THIS.

The best advised I've ever received regarding the issue is (because you cannot avoid borrowing), once you got inside, find your way out FAST. They can't do anything to you if there is no relationship! Let them strangle somebody else. 

What they say...

Silver